
99   SA Flyer Magazine
without consideration of aviation safety or 
other needs of the aviation industry. Some 
regulations are indeed necessary, others 
are either irrelevant or onerous and some 
are downright nonsensical.
A matter of grave concern to AOPA 
is that many of the regulations and 
amendments to the Civil Aviation Act, 
while proposed under the guise of ICAO 
compliance, differ greatly from the SARPs.  
These proposals seem to be motivated 
by private and possibly corrupt special 
interests, as well as being intended to 
relieve CAA of many of its duties and 
responsibilities, and to protect itself against 
liability for its own negligence.
This is against the backdrop of CAA’s 
failure to effectively implement its vaunted 
new IT system, resulting in unacceptably 
large delays and inaccuracies in normally 
mundane tasks such as the issuing and 
renewal of licences and other certicates. 
Proper implementation of the rushed-
through regulations is also unlikely, given 
the last-minute approach by CAA to matters 
that should have been addressed years 
ago.
CAA’s record-keeping has systemic 
problems. This is what is behind the 
requirements for applicants to supply 
vast amounts of paperwork with every 
Certicate of Airworthiness renewal 
application and the need to prove ratings 
on pilot licence renewals. It’s a clumsy 
substitute for CAA’s duty to keep accessible 
les on all aircraft and personnel – an 
important item on ICAO’s audit list.  
In effect, applicants are required to 
furnish a fresh le to CAA annually, often at 
great expense, delay and inconvenience. 
This is also the motivation for private pilots 
suddenly being required to do annual 
licence renewals, rather than the usual 
biennial renewals.
ATNS, ACSA and the SA Weather 
Service will also be coming under close 
scrutiny.
THE SHORT-TERM FUTURE
As an ICAO accredited organisation, 
IAOPA/AOPA has insight into the objectives 
of the audit. The predictions regarding the 
possible outcomes of the ICAO audit vary, 
however.
Some experts are of the view that 
ICAO will overlook the shortcomings of 
our infrastructure and accept the window-
dressing efforts and the lack of proper 
implementation of new regulations. Others 
point out that, since an ICAO audit is now 
considered to be an extraordinary measure, 
the ICAO team will be scratching far deeper 
than the surface of supercial compliance 
with the SARPs, and focusing more on the 
empirical aspects of properly implementing 
safety and security regulations, particularly 
for international operations.
In view of worldwide and local political 
instability and economic malaise, it would 
seem likely that ICAO is under some 
pressure from the major contracting states 
to ensure that effect is given to the SARPs, 
rather than giving much credence to a 
few obscure standards which are not very 
important.
What are the consequences of a 
bad report card from the audit team? 
Well, it does not necessarily mean that 
international travel between South Africa 
and the rest of the world will be relegated to 
rowing-boats.
The Convention has alternative 
provisions where ICAO “is of the opinion 
that the airports or other air navigation 
facilities, including radio and meteorological 
services, of a contracting state are not 
reasonably adequate for the safe, regular, 
efcient, and economical operation of 
international air services, present or 
contemplated.”  
In such a case, and at the request of 
the state, ICAO may agree to provide, staff, 
maintain and administer the state’s aviation 
infrastructure. The state and the users will 
have to bear the costs for ICAO to provide 
an outside service.
Naturally, such an option will be very 
unattractive to our authorities and state 
service providers. Whether or not it would 
AOPA BRIEFING
The proposed Part 93 regulations 
could impose massive costs and 
inconvenience upon businesses that 
own and operate aircraft.