99 SA Flyer Magazine
without consideration of aviation safety or
other needs of the aviation industry. Some
regulations are indeed necessary, others
are either irrelevant or onerous and some
are downright nonsensical.
A matter of grave concern to AOPA
is that many of the regulations and
amendments to the Civil Aviation Act,
while proposed under the guise of ICAO
compliance, differ greatly from the SARPs.
These proposals seem to be motivated
by private and possibly corrupt special
interests, as well as being intended to
relieve CAA of many of its duties and
responsibilities, and to protect itself against
liability for its own negligence.
This is against the backdrop of CAA’s
failure to effectively implement its vaunted
new IT system, resulting in unacceptably
large delays and inaccuracies in normally
mundane tasks such as the issuing and
renewal of licences and other certicates.
Proper implementation of the rushed-
through regulations is also unlikely, given
the last-minute approach by CAA to matters
that should have been addressed years
ago.
CAA’s record-keeping has systemic
problems. This is what is behind the
requirements for applicants to supply
vast amounts of paperwork with every
Certicate of Airworthiness renewal
application and the need to prove ratings
on pilot licence renewals. It’s a clumsy
substitute for CAA’s duty to keep accessible
les on all aircraft and personnel – an
important item on ICAO’s audit list.
In effect, applicants are required to
furnish a fresh le to CAA annually, often at
great expense, delay and inconvenience.
This is also the motivation for private pilots
suddenly being required to do annual
licence renewals, rather than the usual
biennial renewals.
ATNS, ACSA and the SA Weather
Service will also be coming under close
scrutiny.
THE SHORT-TERM FUTURE
As an ICAO accredited organisation,
IAOPA/AOPA has insight into the objectives
of the audit. The predictions regarding the
possible outcomes of the ICAO audit vary,
however.
Some experts are of the view that
ICAO will overlook the shortcomings of
our infrastructure and accept the window-
dressing efforts and the lack of proper
implementation of new regulations. Others
point out that, since an ICAO audit is now
considered to be an extraordinary measure,
the ICAO team will be scratching far deeper
than the surface of supercial compliance
with the SARPs, and focusing more on the
empirical aspects of properly implementing
safety and security regulations, particularly
for international operations.
In view of worldwide and local political
instability and economic malaise, it would
seem likely that ICAO is under some
pressure from the major contracting states
to ensure that effect is given to the SARPs,
rather than giving much credence to a
few obscure standards which are not very
important.
What are the consequences of a
bad report card from the audit team?
Well, it does not necessarily mean that
international travel between South Africa
and the rest of the world will be relegated to
rowing-boats.
The Convention has alternative
provisions where ICAO “is of the opinion
that the airports or other air navigation
facilities, including radio and meteorological
services, of a contracting state are not
reasonably adequate for the safe, regular,
efcient, and economical operation of
international air services, present or
contemplated.”
In such a case, and at the request of
the state, ICAO may agree to provide, staff,
maintain and administer the state’s aviation
infrastructure. The state and the users will
have to bear the costs for ICAO to provide
an outside service.
Naturally, such an option will be very
unattractive to our authorities and state
service providers. Whether or not it would
AOPA BRIEFING
The proposed Part 93 regulations
could impose massive costs and
inconvenience upon businesses that
own and operate aircraft.